At Rising Voices, we often publish about media and indigenous groups; perhaps obviously, the audience for these media is very diverse. While for some, digital media is highly integrated into society, for others digital media is far from accessible.
We recently published a few articles about indigenous groups, endangered languages, and new media (iPad games, youtube videos, a variety of smartphone apps, etc). In these examples, new media is somewhat extent integrated into everyday life.
This article is, alternately, about projects working with indigenous groups that do not – for a variety of reasons – have a high level of access to digital media. Though the Internet can still be of use for their cause, the starting point is quite different.
There are many indigenous communities in South East Asia, where diversity among language and customs is broad. Many of these groups face a variety of difficulties that range from merely inconvenient to potentially devastating.
Often living below the poverty line in remote or difficult-to-access areas, indigenous peoples in Asia may be without access to education or health services. An already precarious situation is worsened by, for example, ethnic persecution or land-grabbing from corporations or governments.
With some exceptions (such as the persecution of the Myanmar's Rohingya people), these concerns are often unheard, as these problems are structural rather than events-based and thus unappealing to mass media, and compounded by the lack of indigenous journalists to tell their own stories.
This is further made worse by local censorship. For example, if a government is making use of indigenous lands (often these are not formally titled, thus creating the possibility for lands to be claimed as unowned or unused) to exploit natural resources, journalists may be unwilling to write about the concerns for fear of reprisal.
Nancy Lai, a Malaysian-based journalist, was quoted in the online magazine Bulatlat saying that most journalists practice self-censorship for fear that their newspaper might be otherwise shutdown. This has proven true, such as in the 2012 assassination of Hang Serei Odom, a Cambodian journalist researching illegal logging (illegal logging in Cambodia often takes place on indigenous lands).
However, some governments appear to be less concerned about reports going out over the Internet, or perhaps they are merely less able to wield control. Teck Chi Wong, editor of Malaysiakini, an online news media outlet, said that the Internet is relatively free from government regulation (again quoted by Bulatlat).
However, some of this may be related to the relationship between local and international control; under certain regimes, some publications can get away with touchy articles, provided they are put out in English (rather than the local language).
The Asia Indigenous People’s Pact (AIPP) works to ensure that indigenous people in Asia have access to all forms of media (much of their work focuses on South and South East Asia). Recently, they held an event in Bangkok bringing together pan-Asian journalists and human rights workers for indigenous’ peoples rights, part of a project entitled “Indigenous Voices in Asia” aiming to ensure that indigenous people in Asia have access to all forms of media.
The summary of the event (published on Eastern Mirror) noted that major barriers and challenges in mainstreaming indigenous peoples’ issues are:
1- Ownership and censorship :
“journalists from mainstream media self-censor their reports on politically sensitive issues, such as indigenous peoples rights… administration, red tape, and legal restrictions to receive broadcasting licenses also hinder indigenous peoples to set up their own community media”
2- Geographical isolation and poor infrastructure
“due to geographical isolation and poor communication infrastructures, mainstream journalists do not reach the indigenous communities and indigenous communities are not able to bring their issues and concerns to mainstream media.”
… and conversely …
3- unequal access to information.
“geographic isolation and poor infrastructure in remote areas limit indigenous peoples to access timely information from mainstream media”
Language barriers and a lack of professional media skills and education among indigenous journalists.
Finally, simplification is also as a problem, or, “romanticizing, stereotyping and criminalizing indigenous peoples in mainstream media”.
The IVA blog discussed:
“The mainstream media in Nepal continued to romanticize indigenous cultures and traditions by giving photo features of one of the biggest cultural festivals of Indigenous communities of Nepal… The mainstream media simply shirked its social responsibility by printing the photograph of the indigenous festival with just a one-line caption under the photo [and] without writing any description…
As a matter of fact the issue of utter marginalization, deprivation, exclusion in connection with indigenous community continues to be a forlorn subject, far from being a matter of mainstream discussion and coverage in Nepali media. ”
IVA is made up of a number of collaborating organizations, including Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact (Thailand), Association of Nepalese Indigenous Journalists (Nepal), Building Community Voices (Cambodia), Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the Archipelago – Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (Indonesia), National Federation of Indigenous Peoples in the Philippines – Kalipunan ng mga Katutubong Mamamayan ng Pilipinas (KAMP) in Philippines, and the Community Knowledge Support Association in Laos
You can follow the “Indigenous Voices in Asia” project on their blog.